5/26/2023 0 Comments Yep programming![]() Thirteen YEP grantees provided STD data for these analyses. Furthermore, the YEP STD rate is below even that of White, non-Hispanic youth. The rate in Hispanic youth is nearly four times higher than in YEP students. Note that the STD rate in Black, non-Hispanic youth is 15 times greater than the rate in YEP students. The YEP STD rate was compared to the national STD rates for chlamydia and gonorrhea together, the two most common STDs, in 15-19 year olds (Figure 3-2). When extrapolated to the most commonly reported format, the rate of STDs in the YEP was only 459 per 100,000 youth. Thus, compared to teens in any of the three normative groups, the YEP data suggest an important effect in reducing the incidence of teen pregnancy.Ī similar analysis was performed to compare self- or clinic-reported STDs in a total of 653 YEP students. The data show that the yearly live birth rates in the three normative comparison groups were 6-18 times greater than in YEP females (p <. The latter normative data includes White, non-Hispanic and Asian teens who have lower teen birth rates, and also includes areas of the state where birth rates are much lower than in the targeted YEP areas. Third, overall teen live birth rates from all 11 states were obtained that described the rate of births for all teens statewide. Second, state-wide ethnic and racial data for teen live birth rates were obtained for each of the states where YEP grantees are located. First, a normative local, city, or reservation rate was computed that includes the number of teen live births matched for ethnicity, race, and location. Three normative data sets for 15-19 year olds were identified to which the group data from the grantees could be compared. A cumulative rate of live births was calculated and reported in Figure 3-1 as births per 1000 female students across all YEP grantees in order to normalize the data to the standard reporting format. The data from Utah’s YEP in preventing a second teen pregnancy are individually featured after the YEP group data are presented.Īccordingly, a total of four YEP grantees were eliminated from the analysis, leaving data from 13 YEP grantees who reported on a total of 270 YEP females, ages 15-19. One additional YEP grantee, the University of Utah, was also excluded because that program works specifically with females who are already teenage mothers, and are therefore at a much higher risk of a second pregnancy. Similarly from the remaining YEP grantees, we included only those females who were of high school age in this data set. ![]() Therefore, three grantees who work exclusively with younger students, or males, were excluded from the live birth analysis. Normative live birth data are commonly presented for 15-19 year olds, as the live birth rate is relatively low for 10-14 year olds. ![]() The YEP’s effect on reproductive health outcomes can be seen in teen live birth rate data collected across the entire Youth Empowerment Program. The issues of reproductive health, but all grantees develop youth assets that have a general effect to reduce risky behaviors. Eight of 17 YEP grantees focus specifically on MHRA 'YEP', All Acronyms, 1 April 2023, Bluebook All Acronyms, YEP (Apr. YEP, All Acronyms, viewed April 1, 2023, MLA All Acronyms. Retrieved April 1, 2023, from Chicago All Acronyms. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Quote Copy APA All Acronyms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |